Saturday, November 5, 2011

Interview with Alex Myers: Popplet

Darts, Visual Culture Jam: Art, Pedagogy, and Creative Resistance


Darts speaks about edutainment and how political ideals are mixing with entertainment. He states that visual culture is our everyday lives and that it is everywhere. Hidden forms of power (exposing and addressing oppression and encouraging social transformation) lie within visual culture. Within a school setting many students will resist and seemingly oppress themselves. These students attempt to make those around them acknowledge their identities and their lived experiences by setting themselves up for either apathetic aggressive behavior toward schooling. “Resistance need to be an effective pedagogical tool for exposing oppression and encouraging personal and social transformation… a location where students and teachers together are able to critically reflect upon and effectively challenge repressive practices and dominant structures that reinforce the inequities of the status quo…”(Darts, 317)

How can we as educators help empower students to meaningfully engage in the ideological and cultural struggles embedded within the visual?

Boyd, "Why Youth (Heart) Social Network Sites"

Boyd mentions in the article that networked publics are where norms are set and reinforced. These sites are where identities are formed, status in negotiated, and peer-to-peer sociality or a way of connecting is utilized.

Not only can a person choose how they are viewed by the “publics” they are also given certain powers over others such as “friends only” restrictions and who they choose can be their friend. Teens join these sites to maintain connections with their friends. Yet things such as “Top Friends” allow a power play to grow between each “friend”, much like an invitation to a party or adding someone to speed dial. As long as you keep the leader happy, they will allow you to stay their “Top Friend.”

Along with these powers and privileges, communities or “networked publics” grow. Social networks allow publics to gather, therefore creating a new kind of public. “Publics, not simply public, and networked publics, not simply publics” (Boyd, 8). In real life the entire world is not watching because it is not physically possible. They might hear about something from word of mouth, but it is impossible for the world to be watching unless a form of technology, such as the television or newsprint, is involved. Using the Internet, four simple properties (Persistence, Searchability, Replicability, and Invisible Audience) make it easy to locate one’s “digital body” and view anything there is to offer.

How can an art educator utilize the "digital body" and the idea of networked publics in their classroom?
What sort of hidden powers lie in networked publics?

Jones and Fox

This article was quite interesting to read. It compared things such as email, gaming, social networking, broadband usage, online shopping and banking, between multiple generations. The results were fascinating. I enjoyed going through each chart or graph to compare my generation with others. I found it informative in certain areas such as the use of social networking sites between the generations. 

I know that both of my parents and my sisters have websites of Facebook. My parents use theirs to set up events for work, and to stay connected to their family and friends, usually by commenting on walls and uploading pictures. 

My older sister once used the site to promote her self-owned company, but now my feed from her has been taken over by pictures and stories about her children. I fear that my niece and nephew will have their own websites before they are 5, and that it will be completely normal to do so for your child.

 Social Networking Site for Babies!

Do you think it is acceptable or right for babies and toddlers to have their own social networking sites?